Category: General

Final Draft

It has been just over four and a half years since I first started working on this thesis (my second attempt at a PhD); a long time personally but not so long geologically. Late this afternoon, whilst thinking of vegan fish and chips, I sent to my supervisors the first full draft of the thesis.

Eight chapters. In order. Plus an appendix.

It was a weirdly momentous occasion. Jon and Justine have both read all of the thesis, but never in order and never as one document.

At the beginning of this year, when we decided on a September submission date for the finished work, I had six chapters in various states of completion. The final chapter, my analysis of what I call the “inference to the existence of a conspiracy,” was the most polished piece of work. Understandable, really; it was the last thing I had written and most of the lessons I had learnt were applied skillfully to it. The earlier chapters, though, looked terrible. I had an introduction chapter which did not seem to be much chop and then followed a literature review which was bloated and looked to have been written by a teenager. The third chapter, on conspiracy theories as explanations, focussed on issues that I had, by now, decided really weren’t worth bothering with, whilst the fifth chapter, on the transmission of conspiracy theories and the act of rumouring… Well, actually, I liked that one. It’s going to be in a book, don’t you know.

Then there was chapter four, the chapter that was only a third written and I really didn’t think could be completed on time, the chapter on the role of selected evidence and disinformation.

So, at the beginning of January, I began rewriting. The first two chapters were completely rewritten, which took a month each. I tore through my notes from four years ago, looking for material which was salient to the arguments I presented in the last few chapters of the masterwork and came up with arguments to explain why I wasn’t going to talk about issues I thought were irrelevant to my central thesis. I wrote the chapters in disparate pieces, tackling new issues when I found myself mentally blocked by some argument. At first I thought this piecemeal approach was a terrible idea, and then a great one, and… Well, by the time I had hacked together something that looked chaptery enough to send to one of my supervisors I was sure the gig was up; the monster I had created made the work of Frankenstein look like art.

Surely, I thought, the September deadline will need to be revised once she sees this.

A week passed; I worked on the next chapter, dreading getting anything vaguely official-looking in my mailbox. Another week passed and by now I was convinced the chapter I had sent was bad; the notes Justine must be making were growing longer and longer by the day. A third week passed and I was almost ready with the next chapter.

An e- mail. Short. “Looking good. Can’t wait to see the next chapter. No major notes; just copyedit stuff.”

I should have been relieved, but I was not. I fumed for days, getting increasingly angry and grumpy. I had been expecting bad news. Good news unsettled me.

It was most irrational.

I sent off the second chapter, knowing that it give the game away. A fortnight later, more good news. Again, I turned sour and angry and grumpy and maddening.

The first three months of this year were the worst, psychologically-speaking, I have known. I still have the sleepless nights, the constant neck pain, the inability to deal with people unexpectedly, but I’m not, at the moment, constantly angry or about to break down into tears. I’ve hit a plateau; with only six weeks to go I think I can probably make it to the finish line without suffering a breakdown (but I will continue to disseminate cliches…). A few months ago, though, I really thought I wouldn’t make it, academically-speaking, this far.

The third chapter was a pain to rewrite and I ended up dumping five thousand words from it a day before I sent it off to be looked at by one of my supervisors. It turns out that those five thousand words really were useless and they will not be coming back anytime soon.

I almost didn’t write the fourth chapter, but seeing “October 8: Deep in the Forest,” a documentary about the Urewera 17″ convinced me that I needed to get my thoughts on disinformation formalised. It’s a great chapter; I think it will be the first thing I articalise come September 2nd.

I grew used to the good news, although Justine did start to come up with a few complaints, usually structural things which always looked easy to solve but never were.

I finished the last chapter proper a few weeks ago, leaving just the introduction and the conclusion to write. Jon and Justine wanted to read the thesis from the beginning, which meant writing the introduction, something that I always write last. It’s much easier to convert a conclusion into an introduction than try to write the intro first. Conclusions, which are filled with “In this work I have…” can easily be converted into shorter pieces in which “I have…” becomes “I will…”

Now I get a few days off, before the copyedits come in. Six weeks to go.

Six.

Weeks.

To.

Go.

Not Conspiracy Corner – The Irish Side of the Moon

Like many Pākeh&#257, I’m mostly Irish on both my parent’s sides, so when the kind people at the Irish Side of the Moon, a radio show from the old country’s own Donegal, asked me for an interview I could hardly say no.

They don’t like the term “conspiracy theory” on the Irish side of the Moon, and I can understand why. The charming Michael and I spent just over an hour talking about my thesis, why I, too, reject the pejorative usage of conspiracy theory and why is it that academics who study conspiracy theories don’t get much respect from their peers? Indeed, we enjoyed doing the interview so much that we recorded it again ((This is true; the real reason for the re-record can be left to your imagination; hopefully it’ll generate some conspiracy theory of its own.)).

You can listen to me wax lyrical here. I do recommend listening to the other shows; the James Randi interview is spectacular and I enjoyed the interview with David Icke, who sounds so sensible for a man who entreats us to beware of alien shape-shifting reptiles.

#twecon 2011

Ladt year I ran #twecon, a tweet-based conference. This year, I’m running it again, in July. Rather than repeat myself, here’s a link to the conference details and a link to a post about last year’s event.

Last year I advertised solely on Twitter, but but turns out that people can easily overlook or miss a tweet (or series thereof); people who follow me were complaining that, had they known about the conference, then they would have given a paper. So, I’m going to ask that if think #twecon is an interesting idea, can you express that interest by either tweeting about #twecon or giving it a mention on your blog/tumblr or whatnot?

Cher.

Be Seeing You.

Breakfast with Osama, Petra and Corin

Breakfast TV; I have conquered you.

If you want to watch me talk about the conspiracy theories surrounding Osama bin Laden’s demise on this mornings TVNZ Breakfast programme, then look no further than here. It’s a short piece; four minutes tops, so there’s an awful lot that could have been said that was left, well, unsaid.

International visitors to this blog (Hello, there!) can watch the clip on YouTube.

I was also completely unaware of the photo of Osama bin Laden that was behind me.

I was given a set of questions to help me prepare, I’ll let you see what I might have said by way of my notes on them so to flesh out what I covered; they also act as a partial explanation as to why it was I talked about the Osama bin Laden conspiracy theories in the way I did.

Now, I should point out that these musings are not necessarily what I’d say on reflection or have said on air; these are my initial reactions to the questions, jotted down quickly whilst eating dinner and watching “Enemy: Starfleet,” the most recent “Star Trek: Phase II” production. So if they’re off or a bit weird, it’s because faux-sixties SF was addling my tired brain.

Enough excuses.

What’s fuelling these conspiracy theories – an information void?

Both a void of information and a general suspicion, both by the Republicans in the US and people skeptical of the War on Terror generally, as to why this happened now and whether it happened at all.

There’s a lack of information with respect to no photos, the weird story about the burial at sea (which has been sneered at and endorsed by various experts), the way the official story changed from “He used his wife as a human shield” to “He was unarmed when he was shot” and the role of the Pakistani intelligence service.

There’s also the misinformation; Sarah Palin claiming it occurred because of evidence solicited by the CIA’s not-torture waterboarding, et cetera.

What do you think is behind that lack of official information around OBL’s death?

Speculating here, but I think a lot of the issues here are due to our expecting large amounts of data to be available immediately in the internet age. If you look at the way the story broke on Twitter so quickly and so accurately, it seems odd that we don’t actually know much more now than we did on Monday afternoon. Governments like to release information at a rate they feel comfortable with to control the discussion; we want all the data now and some people have even gone so far to fabricate data (like the fake photo of bin Laden’s corpse) to fill that void.

Also, I wouldn’t be surprised if the US government is smoothing over some of the operational issues, like working out a narrative with Pakistan to explain why American troops enacted a kill on Pakistani soil. The US had to reveal that bin Laden was dead so they could control the way the story broke, but that doesn’t mean they’re happy with the timing.

If conspiracies are shut down when questions are answered – what are the crucial questions here?

I’m assuming this is a question like “Why are the conspiracy theories proliferating if the data is out there?” If that;s question, then I’ve already answered it.

Can conspiracy theories be instructive in coming to a better understanding, or do they just get in the way- white noise if you like?

Conspiracies occur; no one doubts that. Watergate, the Moscow Show Trials… We have lots of examples of conspiratorial explanations, a lot of which were dismissed by people in authority who were just covering up what really happened. Even if we think most conspiracy theories are bunk, and I’m actually not sure we can assume that without having a really good argument for some claim about how hard it is to satisfy inferring that a conspiracy exists, thinking about claims of conspiratorial behaviour now tells us things like:

“Just how much do we trust official sources?”

“How often do we think conspiracies occur?”

and:

“Who is it they we distrust the most?”

I suspect a lot of the conspiracy theorising about bin Laden’s death is as much to do with “Did it really happen?” as it is to do with frustrations about the War on Terror, America’s role as the world police force and worries about civil liberties being eroded everywhere. I mean, everyone is say “Are we going to be allowed shampoo on airplanes ago now?” which shows that a lot of people think, no matter their opinion on what happened on 9/11, that what happened next was less than desirable.

Have you been watching with interest as these theories spill out? What are some of the more interesting you’ve seen?

Alex Jones, the more extreme version of Glen Beck, who is an example of everything about FOX News which is wrong, has claimed that bin Laden has been dead for years and his body has been kept frozen on ice, saved up for an opportune PR moment (in this case, Obama’s bid for presidential re-election). Jones’s theory is fascinating because he claims bin Laden died in 2002 from kidney failure and that it was Bush and his cronies who put bin Laden on ice; Jones thinks there is no difference between the Republicans and the Democrats and thus all this is is a stunt to keep the status quo popular so to further their control over America and the world in general.

The former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer says ‘If you doubt he’s dead, no photo will satisfy’. Is there an element of truth to that?

Definitely; given that photoshopping is easy and that the altering of photos has been going on as long as photography has been around, a photo won’t cut it, which is why they went for the DNA evidence, but given that there’s already a substantial feeling of mistrust towards the American government, even that evidence is being doubted.

Can the hardcore believers in these conspiracy theories be shifted in their belief?

Not the hardcore, no. They a) don’t accept any official information and b) already believe they know the truth of what is going on.

Calling on you all for help with the Conspiracy Corner

I told you I’d be going silent for a while, didn’t I?

I will apologise for the lack of updates about the Conspiracy Corner segments; at the moment bFM don’t seem to be making podcasts from the breakfast show segments, so I’ve not been able to keep my foreign (and I’m including people outside of Auckland those of you in Auckland who have made the wise decision not to wake up before eight on a Thursday) listeners in the loop. Some of the recent material has been very good, I feel, and I’m hoping I’ll be able to get copies up soon.

I’ll be going silent again very shortly; I’m getting incredibly close to having a full and near final version of the thesis ready to go, so blog post writing really is the least of my concerns at the moment. Before I disappear back into the darkness of my cave, I’d like to ask a favour; on Thursday’s show I am going to talk about the growing conspiracy theories around the death of Osama Bin Laden. I’ve already contemplated talking about the following:

  • The thesis that he was killed after the royal wedding so to prevent a possible terrorist attack at the wedding (which security forces where claiming might occur; prior to the wedding someone in MI5 said they thought the Real IRA might stage an attack).
  • The thesis that this will aid in Obama’s re-election.
  • The thesis that this shows Obama really is a secret Muslim because it’s a diversionary tactic.
  • The thesis that says “He died years ago” and this is a ruse. – See here for an… entertaining take f rom Alex Jones and co. (thanks to David Winter)
  • The “He isn’t dead and this is a ruse” thesis.
  • If you have sources for these theories close to hand, can you e-mail, comment or tweet them to me; I’m a bit busy this week and need a bit of crowd-sourced research. If you know of other conspiracy theories relating to the death of Osama, I’d appreciate being kept in the loop; this is a topic that is bound to grow and grow over the next few days and I might need some help keeping on top of it.

    Cher.

    No pieces of excised thesis for you!

    What ho, everyone, I have good news!

    Well, I have news about a lack of news. That’s “good” in its own respect, surely, since I’ve not really “said” anything to you, my precious internet community, for a few weeks now.

    I’ve not posted any excised snippets of thesis recently because, well, I haven’t really excised anything of note recently. The last chapter I finished drafting, on the role of the intentions of the co-conspirators in conspiracy theories had a very large section ripped out of it, but it was a useless section that did no work and bogged down the flow of the thesis. There was precious little to recommend it to anyone and so it is gone.

    Let us never talk about THAT section again.

    As for the work itself; I’m now hard at work on redrafting chapter four, which is progressing at a very acceptable rate; chapter three, which is currently in the hands of a supervisor, was another almost complete rewrite, whilst chapter four, on the contrast between official and conspiracy theories merely (and I say that advisedly) needs its terminology updated and a section on what other philosophers think added in. Hopefully, by the end of next week, I’ll be reworking my material on rumours.

    Or so the rumour has it ((I apologise; it was too easy a joke to make.)).

    You might also be aware that I’m back on the radio. That goes well, although we just lost Vince and Connor, my compatriats in conspiratorial crime for the last six weeks to, well, rumour only knows. Next week I’m with the winning due of Zac and Ethan, who I am reliably told are excited to be working with me. Frankly, as long as I get to keep my golden throne and packets of Kendall Mint Cake, then I shall be happy with almost anyone.

    Still, I really must get the producer to update the bCasts; they’re running a bit behind and last week’s session on Number Stations was, I think, a definite, not definitive, piece of radio…

    I also going to be the subject of an interview on “The Irish Side of the Moon.”. More news on that as it comes to hand; we had a bit of trouble with the preliminary recording last week (I blame living on the other side of the world; the Aotearoa Side of the Moon, if you will) so we’re going to finish the bastard off, as Edmund Hillary might have said in similar circumstances, next week. Michael, my interlocutor, was great fan to talk with so I’m looking forward to doing it again.

    One also thing before I go back to editing. Last month saw this blog get, on average, about 820 hits per day which is well above the average of 80 to 100 I’d normally get. Most of the new traffic was based around the Christchurch Earthquake posts, specifically the Ken Ring material. Now that the excitement over Ring’s prediction-cum-opinion has died down the massive hits have ceased. The increased popularity of the blog did have one interesting side effect; I went over my traffic allowance for March by one and an half gigs. OpenHost don’t seem to be too worried about that that; they sent me automated e-mails telling me I was over my limit.

    The fame that came from passing comment on Ring and his prediction had other drawbacks as well; several of the comments on this thread were either mentally taxing to translate into readable English or threats of violence upon my person. I eventually gave up replying to the trolls, especially when it got to the point that I couldn’t tell who was trolling who and who was being sincere.

    I still plan to write another post on the conspiracy theories around the earthquake and the significant aftershock; I am, as you may have gathered, a bit busy finishing this PhD. Still, it’s hols week after next, which means no teaching and thus I can use a few of those hours to draft the blogpost.

    Then the hits and attacks can commence anew.

    Joy.